![]() | |
TheBibleForStudents.com
MATTHEW 23. SEVEN WOES TO THE PHARISEES. This last address of Jesus was spoken to a mixed audience. It has caused modern commentators much discomfort. Some wonder if it is really Jesus’ words. Others wish He had not said it. Jesus having started His public ministry to the disciples with eight words of blessing now completes it with seven woes on the Pharisees. He gives them withering scorn, unmistakable denunciation, condemning the nation to Hell. Those who say that the God of the OT is cruel and judgmental, while the God of the NT is gracious and kind have not read the Bible carefully. The 23rd of Matthew is as fierce in its condemnation as Moses' words to Israel in the desert (Deut.28:15-29:28) or Ezekiel's to the exiles; nor can we overlook the middle section of Revelation. God is the same in both Testaments. Since Jesus speaks to His disciples and through them to the Christian world of the future, we must take to heart all that is said here. The Christian Church is the custodian of the Bible and of this teaching, denouncing Israel. There has been animosity between Jews and Christians for centuries, but the Christians were stronger and persecuted the Jews longer and more intensely. It is not a good record. And the lessons we derive from this text are not to remind them of their faults, but to reflect on our own. It was not spoken to us but it was intended for us. The chapter is in three parts. Synopsis of the passage. 23:1-11 Jesus told His followers that the strict religionists were teaching the truth from the Law of Moses, and that the Law should be followed. The problem was not with the information, but the way the teachers behaved. It was not their preaching but their practicing that He condemned. 23:13 The First Woe condemned the scribes and Pharisees for keeping people out of the Kingdom of heaven. They did not hesitate to dissuade people from following Jesus. 23:15 The Second Woe was for making converts that were worse than they were. 23:16 The Third Woe was for finding ways not to honor their commitments. They made a hierarchy of objects to swear by. Jesus illustrated: if you swear by the temple, you are not bound; but if you swear by the gold of the temple, you must keep your promise. The hierarchy of values appears to be that the sacrificial gift is less than 23:23.The Fourth Woe was for straining at gnats—being meticulous about the details of religious observance like tithing the garden herbs--but swallowing the camel. They intended to please God in small things like donations of plants, but ignored crucial matters such as justice and mercy in their dealings with people. 23:25-31 The Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Woes are kinds of hypocrisy. 23:32-36 The last word is damnation of His generation. The punishment of this generation consummates the destruction of the servants of God from Abel to the last prophet in the OT. Crucifying the Son of God is the greatest crime of all time. 23:39 Nevertheless, He will come again. Then they will say “Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord” and mean it. Comments: A farmer went into his barn after a fire to survey the damage. He found a hen sitting on her nest, dead. He lifted her stiff, burnt body and her chicks scurried out, saved by their mother’s sacrifice. That is what Jesus wanted to do for Israel. He would die in the fire, and they could be saved, but they would be lost because they did not come under His wings for shelter. Some details. Tassels were to remind Israelites to keep the Law. (Num.15:37). The longer the tassel, the greater importance the wearer attached to the Law. 23:5 Phylacteries were small leather-covered boxes containing Scripture passages. The four passages were written small on very fine paper and the boxes worn on wrist or forehead: Who is Zechariah the son of Barachiah? That name matches the author of the book of Zechariah. (Zech.1:1) However, the end of his life is not recorded. The last recorded murder of a prophet in OT history was Zechariah the son of Jehoiada. (IIChron.24:20-22). This question has led to much discussion but no conclusion. The basis of His indictment is the tremendous conflict between proclamation and performance. The spiritual elite loved their exalted place in society. They also knew the Law and loved it. They wanted so much to avoid offending God that they built fences of laws around the Laws. For example “You shall not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain. “ In order to protect this most important Law, they refused to say the Name altogether. And in order not to swear by His Name, they invented all kinds of substitutes to swear by, such as the temple or the alter or the gift. On one hand this frustrated honest efforts to keep the Law, and it also made a mockery of it. The second part of His indictment is rebellion against God as represented in His prophets. Israel had a long history of abuse of the prophets. There are a dozen recorded attempts on Jesus’ life, and the final attempt will succeed. The Book of Acts can be read as the systematic persecution of the infant church, trying to strangle the baby in its cradle. Applications: *The Problem of Prominence. In the Church, we must have order, authority and respect. This requires that some will be “leaders” and most of us “followers”. Leadership leads to prominence and advertising leads to excess. Excess leads to vanity and self-indulgence. “Renowned speaker, internationally known author, wonderful singer, outstanding message, gifted evangelist, greatly used of God, the right reverend doctor, princes of the church, Vicar of Christ,” etc. *They hindered people from coming into the Kingdom. Do we turn away from people whom we think are not good candidates for salvation, hopeless cases, too far gone? *They evaded their promises and commitments by various hedging. Christians are quite casual in their vows as well. Finance consultants say about 15% of people who pledge money to a church (and to God!) will not fulfill their promise. Almost 50% of Christians who pledge to be faithful to each other in marriage break their commitment. *Tithing herbs while being unjust to people is a fine hypocrisy and a great wrong. Justice and righteousness are the same word in Greek. Personal righteousness before God must work itself out in justice toward other human beings. Responsibility for past wrongs? Does God hold us accountable for slavery, broken promises to American Indians and other helpless, dependent peoples? *Looking good but hiding big sin is hypocrisy. |
|
![]() |